Argument from reason
Philosophical argument against a naturalistic worldview that, although naturalism allegedly bases itself on rational inferences alone, it must depend on reason, which arose by non-rational Darwinian processes
The argument from reason is a transcendental argument against metaphysical naturalism and for the existence of God (or at least a supernatural being that is the source of human reason). The best-known defender of the argument is C. S. Lewis.
Nº Q4789744 ★
Common · Knowledge
Argument from reason
Philosophical argument against a naturalistic worldview that, although naturalism allegedly bases itself on rational inferences alone, it must depend on reason, which arose by non-rational Darwinian processes
The argument from reason is a transcendental argument against metaphysical naturalism and for the existence of God (or at least a supernatural being that is the source of human reason). The best-known defender of the argument is C. S. Lewis.
Last price
—
Floor price
—
7-day median
—
30-day sales
0
30-day range
—
In circulation
0
Price history
median
low – high
sales
No sales in this period
Show table
| Date | median | Low | High | sales |
|---|
Sales history
- Last sale
- —
- 30-day average
- —
- 30-day low
- —
- 30-day high
- —
- Sales 7d
- 0
- Sales 30d
- 0
No sales yet.
Anonymous sales: no buyer or seller shown. Figures count player-to-player sales only.
From Wikipedia
The argument from reason is a transcendental argument against metaphysical naturalism and for the existence of God (or at least a supernatural being that is the source of human reason). The best-known defender of the argument is C. S. Lewis. Lewis first defended the argument at length in his 1947 book, Miracles: A Preliminary Study. In the second edition of Miracles (1960), Lewis substantially revised and expanded the argument. Contemporary defenders of the argument from reason include Alvin Plantinga, Victor Reppert and William Hasker.
Text: Wikipédia, CC BY-SA 4.0. ·
Related cards
Transcendental argument for the existence of God
Argument that attempts to prove God's existence by arguing that logic, morals, and science ultimately presuppose a supreme being, and that God must be the source of logic and morals
Nº Q17035059 ★
Kalam cosmological argument
Argument for the existence of God
Nº Q6355104 ★★★
Practical reason
The use of reason to decide how to act
Nº Q3376512 ★★★
Evil demon
Concept in Cartesian philosophy
Nº Q1502279 ★★
Might Is Right
Non-fiction work by Arthur Desmond
Nº Q951265 ★★
Argument from free will
Contention that omniscience is incompatible with free will
Nº Q1279214 ★