Cherry picking
Fallacy of selectively presenting evidence or cases that support a position while ignoring or excluding contrary evidence
Nº Q3006765 ★★
Uncommon · Knowledge
Cherry picking
Fallacy of selectively presenting evidence or cases that support a position while ignoring or excluding contrary evidence
Cherry picking is the selective choosing of the most beneficial, profitable or attractive items from what is available. In the legal science, journalism and epidemiology, the term refers to a reporting bias or the act of selectively suppressing evidence.
Last price
—
Floor price
—
7-day median
—
30-day sales
0
30-day range
—
In circulation
0
Price history
median
low – high
sales
No sales in this period
Show table
| Date | median | Low | High | sales |
|---|
Sales history
- Last sale
- —
- 30-day average
- —
- 30-day low
- —
- 30-day high
- —
- Sales 7d
- 0
- Sales 30d
- 0
No sales yet.
Anonymous sales: no buyer or seller shown. Figures count player-to-player sales only.
From Wikipedia
Cherry picking is the selective choosing of the most beneficial, profitable or attractive items from what is available. In the legal science, journalism and epidemiology, the term refers to a reporting bias or the act of selectively suppressing evidence. The fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of cherry picking that focuses on individual data, case report and anecdotal evidence that seem to confirm a particular pre-established position while wilfully ignoring a significant portion of related and similar cases or data that may contradict that position. Cherry picking may be committed intentionally or unintentionally.
Text: Wikipédia, CC BY-SA 4.0. · Image: SkepticalScience (CC BY-SA 4.0) ·
