Conjunction fallacy
Formal fallacy that occurs when it is assumed that specific conditions are more probable than a single general one
A conjunction effect or Linda problem is a bias or mistake in reasoning where adding extra details (an "and" statement or logical conjunction; mathematical shorthand: ∧ {\displaystyle \land } ) to a sentence makes it appear more likely. Logically, this is not possible, because adding more claims can make a true statement false, but cannot make false statements true: If A is true, then A ∧ B {\displaystyle A\land B} might be false (if B is false).
Nº Q2745415 ★
Common · History
Conjunction fallacy
Formal fallacy that occurs when it is assumed that specific conditions are more probable than a single general one
A conjunction effect or Linda problem is a bias or mistake in reasoning where adding extra details (an "and" statement or logical conjunction; mathematical shorthand: ∧ {\displaystyle \land } ) to a sentence makes it appear more likely. Logically, this is not possible, because adding more claims can make a true statement false, but cannot make false statements true: If A is true, then A ∧ B {\displaystyle A\land B} might be false (if B is false).
Last price
—
Floor price
—
7-day median
—
30-day sales
0
30-day range
—
In circulation
0
Price history
median
low – high
sales
No sales in this period
Show table
| Date | median | Low | High | sales |
|---|
Sales history
- Last sale
- —
- 30-day average
- —
- 30-day low
- —
- 30-day high
- —
- Sales 7d
- 0
- Sales 30d
- 0
No sales yet.
Anonymous sales: no buyer or seller shown. Figures count player-to-player sales only.
From Wikipedia
A conjunction effect or Linda problem is a bias or mistake in reasoning where adding extra details (an "and" statement or logical conjunction; mathematical shorthand: ∧ {\displaystyle \land } ) to a sentence makes it appear more likely. Logically, this is not possible, because adding more claims can make a true statement false, but cannot make false statements true: If A is true, then A ∧ B {\displaystyle A\land B} might be false (if B is false). However, if A is false, then A ∧ B {\displaystyle A\land B} will always be false, regardless of what B is. Therefore, A ∧ B {\displaystyle A\land B} cannot be more likely than A.
Text: Wikipédia, CC BY-SA 4.0. · Image: Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0) ·
Related cards
Gambler's fallacy
Mistaken belief that more frequent chance events will lead to less frequent chance events, or vice versa, to balance out
Nº Q839726 ★★★
Special pleading
Informal fallacy
Nº Q3555058 ★★
Fallacy
Use of invalid or otherwise faulty reasoning in the construction of an argument
Nº Q186150 ★★★★
Lump of labour fallacy
Misconception in economics about allocation of work
Nº Q2916947 ★★
Motte-and-bailey fallacy
Type of informal fallacy
Nº Q85786478 ★★★
Non sequitur (fallacy)
Latin phrase; formal fallacy
Nº Q825737 ★★★