Environmental ethics
Part of environmental philosophy
In environmental philosophy, environmental ethics is an established field of practical philosophy "which reconstructs the essential types of argumentation that can be made for protecting natural entities and the sustainable use of natural resources." The main competing paradigms are anthropocentrism, physiocentrism (called ecocentrism as well), and theocentrism.
Nº Q875686 ★★
Uncommon · Knowledge
Environmental ethics
Part of environmental philosophy
In environmental philosophy, environmental ethics is an established field of practical philosophy "which reconstructs the essential types of argumentation that can be made for protecting natural entities and the sustainable use of natural resources." The main competing paradigms are anthropocentrism, physiocentrism (called ecocentrism as well), and theocentrism.
Last price
—
Floor price
—
7-day median
—
30-day sales
0
30-day range
—
In circulation
0
Price history
median
low – high
sales
No sales in this period
Show table
| Date | median | Low | High | sales |
|---|
Sales history
- Last sale
- —
- 30-day average
- —
- 30-day low
- —
- 30-day high
- —
- Sales 7d
- 0
- Sales 30d
- 0
No sales yet.
Anonymous sales: no buyer or seller shown. Figures count player-to-player sales only.
From Wikipedia
In environmental philosophy, environmental ethics is an established field of practical philosophy "which reconstructs the essential types of argumentation that can be made for protecting natural entities and the sustainable use of natural resources." The main competing paradigms are anthropocentrism, physiocentrism (called ecocentrism as well), and theocentrism. Environmental ethics exerts influence on a large range of disciplines including environmental law, environmental sociology, ecotheology, ecological economics, ecology and environmental geography. There are many ethical decisions that human beings make with respect to the environment. These decision raise numerous questions. For example: Should humans continue to clear cut forests for the sake of human consumption? What species or entities ought to be considered for their own sake, independently of its contribution to biodiversity and other extrinsic goods? Why should humans continue to propagate its species, and life itself? Should humans continue to make gasoline-powered vehicles? What environmental obligations do humans need to keep for future generations? Is it right for humans to knowingly cause the extinction of a species for the convenience of humanity? How should humans best use and conserve the space environment to secure and expand life? What role can Planetary Boundaries play in reshaping the human-earth relationship?
Text: Wikipédia, CC BY-SA 4.0. · Image: Raphael (Public domain) ·
Related cards
Environmental education
Branch of pedagogy
Nº Q948732 ★★★
Ecotheology
Form of constructive theology that focuses on the interrelationships of religion and nature, particularly in the light of environmental concerns
Nº Q920939 ★
Environmental health
Public health branch focused on environmental impacts on human health
Nº Q932068 ★
Environmental technology
Technical and technological processes for protection of the environment
Nº Q743030 ★★
ethic of conviction and the ethic of responsibility
Nº Q109024163 ★
Minimal ethics
Moral theory by Ruwen Ogien
Nº Q3591971 ★