Environmental ethics

Part of environmental philosophy

In environmental philosophy, environmental ethics is an established field of practical philosophy "which reconstructs the essential types of argumentation that can be made for protecting natural entities and the sustainable use of natural resources." The main competing paradigms are anthropocentrism, physiocentrism (called ecocentrism as well), and theocentrism.

Nº Q875686 ★★

Uncommon · Knowledge

Environmental ethics

Part of environmental philosophy

In environmental philosophy, environmental ethics is an established field of practical philosophy "which reconstructs the essential types of argumentation that can be made for protecting natural entities and the sustainable use of natural resources." The main competing paradigms are anthropocentrism, physiocentrism (called ecocentrism as well), and theocentrism.

Last price

—

Floor price

—

7-day median

—

30-day sales

0

30-day range

—

In circulation

0

Price history

Show table
Datemedian LowHighsales

Sales history

Last sale
—
30-day average
—
30-day low
—
30-day high
—
Sales 7d
0
Sales 30d
0

No sales yet.

Anonymous sales: no buyer or seller shown. Figures count player-to-player sales only.

From Wikipedia

In environmental philosophy, environmental ethics is an established field of practical philosophy "which reconstructs the essential types of argumentation that can be made for protecting natural entities and the sustainable use of natural resources." The main competing paradigms are anthropocentrism, physiocentrism (called ecocentrism as well), and theocentrism. Environmental ethics exerts influence on a large range of disciplines including environmental law, environmental sociology, ecotheology, ecological economics, ecology and environmental geography. There are many ethical decisions that human beings make with respect to the environment. These decision raise numerous questions. For example: Should humans continue to clear cut forests for the sake of human consumption? What species or entities ought to be considered for their own sake, independently of its contribution to biodiversity and other extrinsic goods? Why should humans continue to propagate its species, and life itself? Should humans continue to make gasoline-powered vehicles? What environmental obligations do humans need to keep for future generations? Is it right for humans to knowingly cause the extinction of a species for the convenience of humanity? How should humans best use and conserve the space environment to secure and expand life? What role can Planetary Boundaries play in reshaping the human-earth relationship?

Text: Wikipédia, CC BY-SA 4.0. · Image: Raphael (Public domain) ·

Related cards

View card

Confirmation