Forcing (mathematics)
In set theory, a technique for enlarging models of axioms of set theory (e.g. ZFC) by adjoining new elements, often used for proving consistency and independence results
In set theory, forcing is a technique for proving consistency and independence results. Intuitively, forcing can be thought of as a technique to expand the set theoretical universe V {\displaystyle V} to a larger universe V [ G ] {\displaystyle V[G]} by introducing a new "generic" object G {\displaystyle G} .
Nº Q1003136 ★
Common · History
Forcing (mathematics)
In set theory, a technique for enlarging models of axioms of set theory (e.g. ZFC) by adjoining new elements, often used for proving consistency and independence results
In set theory, forcing is a technique for proving consistency and independence results. Intuitively, forcing can be thought of as a technique to expand the set theoretical universe V {\displaystyle V} to a larger universe V [ G ] {\displaystyle V[G]} by introducing a new "generic" object G {\displaystyle G} .
From Wikipedia
In set theory, forcing is a technique for proving consistency and independence results. Intuitively, forcing can be thought of as a technique to expand the set theoretical universe V {\displaystyle V} to a larger universe V [ G ] {\displaystyle V[G]} by introducing a new "generic" object G {\displaystyle G} . Forcing was first used by Paul Cohen in 1963, to prove the independence of the axiom of choice and the continuum hypothesis from Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory. It has been considerably reworked and simplified in the following years, and has since served as a powerful technique, both in set theory and in areas of mathematical logic such as computability theory. Descriptive set theory uses the notions of forcing from both computability theory and set theory. Forcing has also been used in model theory, but it is common in model theory to define genericity directly without mention of forcing.
Text: Wikipédia, CC BY-SA 4.0. ·
Related cards
-
Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory
Variant of ZFC, the standard axiomatic set theory
Nº Q191849 ★★★
Not listed
-
C
Continuum hypothesis
Hypothesis that no set has a cardinality between that of the integers and that of the real numbers
Nº Q208416 ★★★
Not listed
-
A
Axiom of regularity
Axiom stating that all sets are well-founded
Nº Q470981 ★
Not listed
-
Paul Cohen
American mathematician
Nº Q216809 ★
Not listed
-
C
Continuum (set theory)
Set whose elements are the real numbers
Nº Q1174982 ★
Not listed
-
F
Friction-maxxing
Practice of intentionally choosing less convenient options
Nº Q138641577 ★
Not listed