Neolithic creolisation hypothesis
Archaeological hypothesis
The Neolithic creolisation hypothesis, first put forward by Marek Zvelebil in 1995, situates the Proto-Indo-European Urheimat in northern Europe in Neolithic times at the Baltic coast, proposing that migrating Neolithic farmers mixed with indigenous Mesolithic hunter-gatherer communities, resulting in the genesis of the Indo-European language family. The hypothesis holds that the linguistic and cultural influence of the Neolithic farmers was far greater than the persistence of their foreign gene pool.
Nº Q4138804 ★
Common · Knowledge
Neolithic creolisation hypothesis
Archaeological hypothesis
The Neolithic creolisation hypothesis, first put forward by Marek Zvelebil in 1995, situates the Proto-Indo-European Urheimat in northern Europe in Neolithic times at the Baltic coast, proposing that migrating Neolithic farmers mixed with indigenous Mesolithic hunter-gatherer communities, resulting in the genesis of the Indo-European language family. The hypothesis holds that the linguistic and cultural influence of the Neolithic farmers was far greater than the persistence of their foreign gene pool.
Last price
—
Floor price
—
7-day median
—
30-day sales
0
30-day range
—
In circulation
0
Price history
median
low – high
sales
No sales in this period
Show table
| Date | median | Low | High | sales |
|---|
Sales history
- Last sale
- —
- 30-day average
- —
- 30-day low
- —
- 30-day high
- —
- Sales 7d
- 0
- Sales 30d
- 0
No sales yet.
Anonymous sales: no buyer or seller shown. Figures count player-to-player sales only.
From Wikipedia
The Neolithic creolisation hypothesis, first put forward by Marek Zvelebil in 1995, situates the Proto-Indo-European Urheimat in northern Europe in Neolithic times at the Baltic coast, proposing that migrating Neolithic farmers mixed with indigenous Mesolithic hunter-gatherer communities, resulting in the genesis of the Indo-European language family. The hypothesis holds that the linguistic and cultural influence of the Neolithic farmers was far greater than the persistence of their foreign gene pool. According to Zvelebil, the linguistic influence of indigenous hunter-gatherers predominated, but other archeologists, such as Marek Nowak, favor a scenario compatible to Colin Renfrew's Anatolian hypothesis in attributing the leading linguistic role to the foreign farmers.
Text: Wikipédia, CC BY-SA 4.0. ·
Related cards
-
Armenian hypothesis
Hypothesis in historical linguistics that the Urheimat of proto-Indo-European is in the Caucacus
Nº Q2457968 ★★
Not listed
-
Proto-Indo-European homeland
Prehistoric urheimat of the Proto-Indo-European language
Nº Q4006441 ★★★
Not listed
-
Interbreeding between archaic and modern humans
Evidence of human hybridization during the Middle Paleolithic and early Upper Paleolithic
Nº Q4785541 ★★★
Not listed
-
P
Proto-Euphratean language
Hypothetical unclassified language of late Neolithic Mesopotamia
Nº Q15918844 ★★
Not listed
-
Proto-Uralic language
Proto-language
Nº Q288765 ★★
Not listed
-
Eurasiatic languages
Proposed language macrofamily
Nº Q771861 ★★
Not listed