Physiocracy

Economic theory

Nº Q183244 ★★★

Rare · History

Physiocracy

Economic theory

Physiocracy (French: physiocratie; from the Greek for "government of nature") is an economic theory developed by a group of 18th-century Age of Enlightenment French economists. They believed that the wealth of nations derived solely from the value of "land agriculture" or "land development" and that agricultural products should be highly priced.

Last price

—

Floor price

—

7-day median

—

30-day sales

0

30-day range

—

In circulation

0

Price history

Show table
Datemedian LowHighsales

Sales history

Last sale
—
30-day average
—
30-day low
—
30-day high
—
Sales 7d
0
Sales 30d
0

No sales yet.

Anonymous sales: no buyer or seller shown. Figures count player-to-player sales only.

№ Numbered editions · 0 minted Next #1 · Score ×3
From Wikipedia

Physiocracy (French: physiocratie; from the Greek for "government of nature") is an economic theory developed by a group of 18th-century Age of Enlightenment French economists. They believed that the wealth of nations derived solely from the value of "land agriculture" or "land development" and that agricultural products should be highly priced. Their theories originated in France and were most popular during the second half of the 18th century. Physiocracy became one of the first well-developed theories of economics. While virtually totally debunked today by orthodox economics, physiocratic governments made significant positive influence on national economies by developing land for agricultural use, building roads and canals for agricultural trade and utilising trade as a mechanism for benefiting from surplus agricultural produce; strengthening currencies and balance of payments. It is thus today known as an unintended means to an end. François Quesnay (1694–1774), the Marquis de Mirabeau (1715–1789) and Anne-Robert-Jacques Turgot (1727–1781) dominated the movement, which immediately preceded the first modern school, classical economics, which began with the publication of Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations in 1776. The physiocrats made a significant contribution in their emphasis on productive work as the source of national wealth. This contrasted with earlier schools, in particular mercantilism, which often focused on the ruler's wealth, accumulation of gold, or the balance of trade. Whereas the mercantilist school of economics held that value in the products of society was created at the point of sale, by the seller exchanging his products for more money than the products had "previously" been worth, the physiocratic school of economics was the first to see labor as the sole source of value. For the physiocrats, however, only agricultural labor created this value in the products of society. All "industrial" and non-agricultural labors were "unproductive appendages" to agricultural labor. Quesnay was likely...

Text: Wikipédia, CC BY-SA 4.0. · Image: Unidentified painter (Public domain) ·

Related cards

Confirmation