Overengineering

Designing of a product to be more robust or complicated than what is necessary for its application

Overengineering, or over-engineering, is the act of designing a product or providing a solution to a problem that is complicated in a way that provides no value or could have been designed to be simpler. As a design philosophy, it is a violation of the practice of value engineering and the minimalist ethos of "less is more" or "worse is better", as well as the related KISS principle.

Nº Q2042313 ★★

Peu commune · Savoirs

Overengineering

Designing of a product to be more robust or complicated than what is necessary for its application

Texte en anglais

Overengineering, or over-engineering, is the act of designing a product or providing a solution to a problem that is complicated in a way that provides no value or could have been designed to be simpler. As a design philosophy, it is a violation of the practice of value engineering and the minimalist ethos of "less is more" or "worse is better", as well as the related KISS principle.

Dernier prix

—

Prix plancher

—

Médiane 7 j

—

Ventes 30 j

0

Fourchette 30 j

—

En circulation

0

Cours

Voir le tableau
Datemédiane MinMaxventes

Historique des ventes

Dernière vente
—
Moyenne 30 j
—
Plus bas 30 j
—
Plus haut 30 j
—
Ventes 7 j
0
Ventes 30 j
0

Aucune vente pour l'instant.

Ventes anonymes : ni acheteur ni vendeur. Les chiffres ne comptent que les ventes entre joueurs.

Sur Wikipédia

Texte en anglais Pas encore d'article dans ta langue : extrait en anglais.

Overengineering, or over-engineering, is the act of designing a product or providing a solution to a problem that is complicated in a way that provides no value or could have been designed to be simpler. As a design philosophy, it is a violation of the practice of value engineering and the minimalist ethos of "less is more" or "worse is better", as well as the related KISS principle. It has been employed intentionally in situations where an exceptionally wide margin of error is desired, but is otherwise considered an error of design due to the disproportionate time and resources needed to manufacture and maintain such products, and the introduction of unneeded single points of failure. NASA listed excessive features as one of the top 10 risks of failure for development projects. As an example, Mercedes-Benz developed and removed 600 non-essential features from their cars due to malfunctions, lack of usability and customer complaints.

Texte : Wikipédia en anglais, CC BY-SA 4.0. · Image : Steve Jurvetson from Menlo Park, USA (CC BY 2.0) ·

Cartes voisines

Voir la fiche

Confirmation