Construct validity
The degree to which a test measures what it claims, or purports, to be measuring
Construct validity concerns how well a set of indicators represents or reflects a concept that is not directly measurable. Construct validation is the accumulation of evidence to support the interpretation of what a measure reflects.
Nº Q1592163 ★
Common · Knowledge
Construct validity
The degree to which a test measures what it claims, or purports, to be measuring
Construct validity concerns how well a set of indicators represents or reflects a concept that is not directly measurable. Construct validation is the accumulation of evidence to support the interpretation of what a measure reflects.
From Wikipedia
Construct validity concerns how well a set of indicators represents or reflects a concept that is not directly measurable. Construct validation is the accumulation of evidence to support the interpretation of what a measure reflects. Modern validity theory defines construct validity as the overarching concern of validity research, subsuming all other types of validity evidence such as content validity and criterion validity. Construct validity is the appropriateness of inferences made based on observations or measurements (often test scores), specifically whether a test can reasonably be considered to reflect the intended construct. Constructs are abstractions that are deliberately created by researchers to conceptualize the latent variable, which is correlated with scores on a given measure (although it is not directly observable). Construct validity examines the question: Does the measure behave like the theory says a measure of that construct should behave? Construct validity is essential to the perceived overall validity of the test. Construct validity is particularly important in the social sciences, psychology, psychometrics and language studies. Psychologists such as Samuel Messick (1998) have pushed for a unified view of construct validity "...as an integrated evaluative judgment of the degree to which empirical evidence and theoretical rationales support the adequacy and appropriateness of inferences and actions based on test scores..." While Messick's views are popularized in educational measurement and originated in a career around explaining validity in the context of the testing industry, a definition more in line with foundational psychological research, supported by data-driven empirical studies that emphasize statistical and causal reasoning was given by (Borsboom et al., 2004). Key to construct validity are the theoretical ideas behind the trait under consideration, i.e., the concepts that organize how aspects of personality, intelligence, etc. are viewed. Paul Meehl states that, "The best construct is the one around which we can build...
Text: Wikipédia, CC BY-SA 4.0. ·
Related cards
-
Gold standard (test)
Diagnostic test or benchmark that is the best available under reasonable conditions
Nº Q514654 ★
Not listed
-
C
Confirmation
Term in Philosophy of science, regarding the verification of scientific claims
Nº Q9340605 ★★★
Not listed
-
C
Credulity
State of willingness to believe in one or many people or things in the absence of reasonable proof or knowledge
Nº Q5183820 ★
Not listed
-
C
Comprehension (logic)
Totality of intensions, that is, properties or qualities, that an object possesses
Nº Q5156948 ★★★
Not listed
-
Reason
Capacity for consciously making sense of things
Nº Q178354 ★★★
Not listed
-
t
truthfulness
Opposable (and quantifiable over a unit scale) characteristic of a binary property to assert it, estimate it, observe it, measure it, or consider it as being “true” for the considered object
Nº Q2540460 ★★
Not listed
-
Judgement
Evaluation of evidence to make a considered decision
Nº Q12621536 ★★★
Not listed
-
e
examining
Detection to what extent a test object meets a requirement
Nº Q2115471 ★
Not listed
-
D
Data quality
State of qualitative or quantitative pieces of information
Nº Q1757694 ★
Not listed
-
V
Validated numerics
Numerics including mathematically strict error evaluation
Nº Q63307393 ★
Not listed
-
Verificationism
Philosophical doctrine that only statements that are empirically verifiable are cognitively meaningful
Nº Q2297476 ★
Not listed
-
Explanation
Set of statements constructed to describe reasons why such as for facts
Nº Q7958 ★★
Not listed
-
IQ classification
Categorisation of people based on intelligence
Nº Q5973340 ★★★★★
Not listed
-
C
Constitutionality
Compatible with the constitution
Nº Q2515622 ★★
Not listed
-
N
Norm-referenced test
Yields an estimate of the testee's position in population
Nº Q7051413 ★★
Not listed
-
I
Indication (medicine)
Valid reason to use a certain test, medication, procedure, or surgery
Nº Q496997 ★★★
Not listed
-
Measure (mathematics)
Function assigning numbers to some subsets of a set, which could be seen as a generalization of length, area, volume and integral
Nº Q192276 ★★★
Not listed
-
v
validity
Property, philosophical term
Nº Q350184 ★
Not listed