Construct validity
The degree to which a test measures what it claims, or purports, to be measuring
Construct validity concerns how well a set of indicators represents or reflects a concept that is not directly measurable. Construct validation is the accumulation of evidence to support the interpretation of what a measure reflects.
Nº Q1592163 ★
Common · Knowledge
Construct validity
The degree to which a test measures what it claims, or purports, to be measuring
Construct validity concerns how well a set of indicators represents or reflects a concept that is not directly measurable. Construct validation is the accumulation of evidence to support the interpretation of what a measure reflects.
From Wikipedia
Construct validity concerns how well a set of indicators represents or reflects a concept that is not directly measurable. Construct validation is the accumulation of evidence to support the interpretation of what a measure reflects. Modern validity theory defines construct validity as the overarching concern of validity research, subsuming all other types of validity evidence such as content validity and criterion validity. Construct validity is the appropriateness of inferences made based on observations or measurements (often test scores), specifically whether a test can reasonably be considered to reflect the intended construct. Constructs are abstractions that are deliberately created by researchers to conceptualize the latent variable, which is correlated with scores on a given measure (although it is not directly observable). Construct validity examines the question: Does the measure behave like the theory says a measure of that construct should behave? Construct validity is essential to the perceived overall validity of the test. Construct validity is particularly important in the social sciences, psychology, psychometrics and language studies. Psychologists such as Samuel Messick (1998) have pushed for a unified view of construct validity "...as an integrated evaluative judgment of the degree to which empirical evidence and theoretical rationales support the adequacy and appropriateness of inferences and actions based on test scores..." While Messick's views are popularized in educational measurement and originated in a career around explaining validity in the context of the testing industry, a definition more in line with foundational psychological research, supported by data-driven empirical studies that emphasize statistical and causal reasoning was given by (Borsboom et al., 2004). Key to construct validity are the theoretical ideas behind the trait under consideration, i.e., the concepts that organize how aspects of personality, intelligence, etc. are viewed. Paul Meehl states that, "The best construct is the one around which we can build...
Text: Wikipédia, CC BY-SA 4.0. ·
Related cards
-
V
Validity (statistics)
Extent to which a concept, conclusion or measurement is well-founded and corresponds accurately to the real world
Nº Q18757 ★★★
Not listed
-
T
Testability
Extent to which truthness or falseness of a hypothesis/declaration can be tested, based on the accessibility of evidence
Nº Q2149495 ★
Not listed
-
V
Validation (drug manufacture)
Process of establishing documentary evidence demonstrating that a procedure, process, or activity carried out in testing and then production maintains the desired level of compliance at all stages
Nº Q359176 ★
Not listed
-
S
Software verification and validation
Discipline that ensures software quality
Nº Q7921330 ★
Not listed
-
C
Confirmation bias
Tendency of people to favor information that confirms their beliefs or hypotheses
Nº Q431498 ★★★★
Not listed
-
Psychometrics
Study of the theory and technique of psychological measurement
Nº Q506132 ★★★
Not listed