Corpus delicti
Legal principle requiring proof of a crime occurring prior to conviction of anyone for that crime
In Western law, corpus delicti (Latin for 'body of the crime'; pl. corpora delicti), is the principle that a crime must be proven to have occurred before a person could be convicted of having committed that crime. For example, a person cannot be tried for larceny unless it can be proven that property has been stolen.
Nº Q301980 ★★
Uncommon · Literature
Corpus delicti
Legal principle requiring proof of a crime occurring prior to conviction of anyone for that crime
In Western law, corpus delicti (Latin for 'body of the crime'; pl. corpora delicti), is the principle that a crime must be proven to have occurred before a person could be convicted of having committed that crime. For example, a person cannot be tried for larceny unless it can be proven that property has been stolen.
Last price
—
Floor price
—
7-day median
—
30-day sales
0
30-day range
—
In circulation
0
Price history
median
low – high
sales
No sales in this period
Show table
| Date | median | Low | High | sales |
|---|
Sales history
- Last sale
- —
- 30-day average
- —
- 30-day low
- —
- 30-day high
- —
- Sales 7d
- 0
- Sales 30d
- 0
No sales yet.
Anonymous sales: no buyer or seller shown. Figures count player-to-player sales only.
From Wikipedia
In Western law, corpus delicti (Latin for 'body of the crime'; pl. corpora delicti), is the principle that a crime must be proven to have occurred before a person could be convicted of having committed that crime. For example, a person cannot be tried for larceny unless it can be proven that property has been stolen. Likewise in order for a person to be tried for arson, it must be proven that a criminal act resulted in the burning of a property. Black's Law Dictionary (6th ed.) defines "corpus delicti" as: "the fact of a crime having been actually committed". In common law systems, the concept has its outgrowth in several principles. Many jurisdictions hold as a legal rule that a defendant's out-of-court confession alone, is insufficient evidence to prove the defendant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. A corollary to this rule is that an accused cannot be convicted solely upon the testimony of an accomplice. Some jurisdictions also hold that without first showing independent corroboration that a crime has occurred, the prosecution may not introduce evidence of the defendant's statement.
Text: Wikipédia, CC BY-SA 4.0. ·
Related cards
Arson
Crime of willfully and maliciously setting fire to property
Nº Q327541 ★★★
Legal death
Recognition under the law of a particular jurisdiction that a person is no longer alive
Nº Q3012966 ★★★
Alibi
Form of defense used in criminal procedure
Nº Q468947 ★★★
Criminal conversion
Crime
Nº Q1361943 ★★★
Element (criminal law)
A substantive component of a criminal offence that must be proven
Nº Q2621792 ★★★★
Habeas corpus
Court action challenging unlawful detention
Nº Q220596 ★★★★