C

Corpus delicti

Legal principle requiring proof of a crime occurring prior to conviction of anyone for that crime

In Western law, corpus delicti (Latin for 'body of the crime'; pl. corpora delicti), is the principle that a crime must be proven to have occurred before a person could be convicted of having committed that crime. For example, a person cannot be tried for larceny unless it can be proven that property has been stolen.

Nº Q301980 ★★

Poco común · Literatura

Corpus delicti

Legal principle requiring proof of a crime occurring prior to conviction of anyone for that crime

Texto en inglés

In Western law, corpus delicti (Latin for 'body of the crime'; pl. corpora delicti), is the principle that a crime must be proven to have occurred before a person could be convicted of having committed that crime. For example, a person cannot be tried for larceny unless it can be proven that property has been stolen.

Último precio

—

Precio mínimo

—

Mediana 7 d

—

Ventas 30 d

0

Rango 30 d

—

En circulación

0

Cotización

Ver tabla
Fechamediana MínMáxventas

Historial de ventas

Última venta
—
Media 30 d
—
Mínimo 30 d
—
Máximo 30 d
—
Ventas 7 d
0
Ventas 30 d
0

Aún no hay ventas.

Ventas anónimas: sin comprador ni vendedor. Las cifras solo cuentan ventas entre jugadores.

En Wikipedia

Texto en inglés Aún no hay artículo en tu idioma: extracto en inglés.

In Western law, corpus delicti (Latin for 'body of the crime'; pl. corpora delicti), is the principle that a crime must be proven to have occurred before a person could be convicted of having committed that crime. For example, a person cannot be tried for larceny unless it can be proven that property has been stolen. Likewise in order for a person to be tried for arson, it must be proven that a criminal act resulted in the burning of a property. Black's Law Dictionary (6th ed.) defines "corpus delicti" as: "the fact of a crime having been actually committed". In common law systems, the concept has its outgrowth in several principles. Many jurisdictions hold as a legal rule that a defendant's out-of-court confession alone, is insufficient evidence to prove the defendant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. A corollary to this rule is that an accused cannot be convicted solely upon the testimony of an accomplice. Some jurisdictions also hold that without first showing independent corroboration that a crime has occurred, the prosecution may not introduce evidence of the defendant's statement.

Texto: Wikipedia en inglés, CC BY-SA 4.0. ·

Cartas cercanas

Ver la ficha

Confirmación