Nate Soares
Artificial intelligence researcher
Nathaniel Soares is an American artificial intelligence author and researcher known for his work on existential risk from AI. In 2014, Soares co-authored a paper that introduced the term AI alignment, the challenge of making increasingly capable AIs behave as intended.
Nº Q136721135 ★★
Uncommon · People
Nate Soares
Artificial intelligence researcher
Nathaniel Soares is an American artificial intelligence author and researcher known for his work on existential risk from AI. In 2014, Soares co-authored a paper that introduced the term AI alignment, the challenge of making increasingly capable AIs behave as intended.
Last price
—
Floor price
—
7-day median
—
30-day sales
0
30-day range
—
In circulation
0
Price history
median
low – high
sales
No sales in this period
Show table
| Date | median | Low | High | sales |
|---|
Sales history
- Last sale
- —
- 30-day average
- —
- 30-day low
- —
- 30-day high
- —
- Sales 7d
- 0
- Sales 30d
- 0
No sales yet.
Anonymous sales: no buyer or seller shown. Figures count player-to-player sales only.
From Wikipedia
Nathaniel Soares is an American artificial intelligence author and researcher known for his work on existential risk from AI. In 2014, Soares co-authored a paper that introduced the term AI alignment, the challenge of making increasingly capable AIs behave as intended. Soares is the president of the Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI), a research nonprofit based in Berkeley, California. In 2025, Soares co-authored If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies with Eliezer Yudkowsky. In the book, he argues that creating vastly smarter-than-human AI (or superintelligence) “using anything remotely like current techniques” would very likely result in human extinction; he further contends that AI alignment remains nascent and that international regulatory intervention will likely be required to prevent developers from racing to build catastrophically dangerous systems. The book received mainstream attention and mixed reviews: The Guardian selected it as "Book of the day" and described it as "clear" though its conclusions are "hard to swallow"; The Washington Post characterized it as a polemic that offers few concrete instructions; and The New Yorker featured it in "Briefly Noted." Coverage also included reporting in Wired, Semafor, and SFGATE.
Text: Wikipédia, CC BY-SA 4.0. · Image: Unknown authorUnknown author (CC0) ·
Related cards
Łukasz Kaiser
Machine learning researcher
Nº Q30251976 ★★★
Sebastian Kondracki
Polish AI expert
Nº Q133698642 ★★★
Shaul Chorev
Researcher
Nº Q6982109 ★★★★
Woohyung Lim
South Korean AI researcher
Nº Q102384998 ★★★
Ilan Shchori
Researcher
Nº Q6747887 ★★★
Lior Zalmanson
Researcher
Nº Q130802787 ★★★