Nate Soares

Chercheur en IA

Nathaniel Soares is an American artificial intelligence author and researcher known for his work on existential risk from AI. In 2014, Soares co-authored a paper that introduced the term AI alignment, the challenge of making increasingly capable AIs behave as intended.

Nº Q136721135 ★★

Peu commune · Personnalités

Nate Soares

Chercheur en IA

Texte en anglais

Nathaniel Soares is an American artificial intelligence author and researcher known for his work on existential risk from AI. In 2014, Soares co-authored a paper that introduced the term AI alignment, the challenge of making increasingly capable AIs behave as intended.

Dernier prix

—

Prix plancher

—

Médiane 7 j

—

Ventes 30 j

0

Fourchette 30 j

—

En circulation

0

Cours

Voir le tableau
Datemédiane MinMaxventes

Historique des ventes

Dernière vente
—
Moyenne 30 j
—
Plus bas 30 j
—
Plus haut 30 j
—
Ventes 7 j
0
Ventes 30 j
0

Aucune vente pour l'instant.

Ventes anonymes : ni acheteur ni vendeur. Les chiffres ne comptent que les ventes entre joueurs.

Sur Wikipédia

Texte en anglais Pas encore d'article dans ta langue : extrait en anglais.

Nathaniel Soares is an American artificial intelligence author and researcher known for his work on existential risk from AI. In 2014, Soares co-authored a paper that introduced the term AI alignment, the challenge of making increasingly capable AIs behave as intended. Soares is the president of the Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI), a research nonprofit based in Berkeley, California. In 2025, Soares co-authored If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies with Eliezer Yudkowsky. In the book, he argues that creating vastly smarter-than-human AI (or superintelligence) “using anything remotely like current techniques” would very likely result in human extinction; he further contends that AI alignment remains nascent and that international regulatory intervention will likely be required to prevent developers from racing to build catastrophically dangerous systems. The book received mainstream attention and mixed reviews: The Guardian selected it as "Book of the day" and described it as "clear" though its conclusions are "hard to swallow"; The Washington Post characterized it as a polemic that offers few concrete instructions; and The New Yorker featured it in "Briefly Noted." Coverage also included reporting in Wired, Semafor, and SFGATE.

Texte : Wikipédia en anglais, CC BY-SA 4.0. · Image : Unknown authorUnknown author (CC0) ·

Cartes voisines

Voir la fiche

Confirmation