Judgment defaulter
Person fails to fulfill the debt obligations and default judgment in China
Nº Q60059551 ★★★
Rara · Naturaleza
Judgment defaulter
Person fails to fulfill the debt obligations and default judgment in China
In China, judgment defaulter (Chinese: 失信被执行人) or court defaulters, commonly known as laolai (Chinese: 老赖) or untrustworthy person (Chinese: 失信人), is defined as a person who is able to fulfill legal obligations determined by the court, but has refused to do so, or illegally tries to evade enforcement such as hiding their assets. According to the relevant regulations, persons who receive default judgment by the People's Courts are subject to restrictions on "high spending" or "high consumption" that are unrelated to basic living or bu...
Último precio
—
Precio mínimo
—
Mediana 7 d
—
Ventas 30 d
0
Rango 30 d
—
En circulación
0
Cotización
mediana
mín – máx
ventas
Sin ventas en el periodo
Ver tabla
| Fecha | mediana | Mín | Máx | ventas |
|---|
Historial de ventas
- Última venta
- —
- Media 30 d
- —
- Mínimo 30 d
- —
- Máximo 30 d
- —
- Ventas 7 d
- 0
- Ventas 30 d
- 0
Aún no hay ventas.
Ventas anónimas: sin comprador ni vendedor. Las cifras solo cuentan ventas entre jugadores.
En Wikipedia
Texto en inglés Aún no hay artículo en tu idioma: extracto en inglés.
In China, judgment defaulter (Chinese: 失信被执行人) or court defaulters, commonly known as laolai (Chinese: 老赖) or untrustworthy person (Chinese: 失信人), is defined as a person who is able to fulfill legal obligations determined by the court, but has refused to do so, or illegally tries to evade enforcement such as hiding their assets. According to the relevant regulations, persons who receive default judgment by the People's Courts are subject to restrictions on "high spending" or "high consumption" that are unrelated to basic living or business activities. These can include bans from traveling on high speed trains, or not being able to have your children go to private schools. Jeremy Daum, a senior research fellow at Yale Law School's Paul Tsai China Center, explains that the idea is that since the majority of "court awards" are going to be monetary, the "judgement defaulters" should not be continuing to be spending a lot of money if they have not yet paid back the court award, and instead their money should be spent to "fix that problem".
Texto: Wikipedia en inglés, CC BY-SA 4.0. ·