J

Judgment defaulter

Person fails to fulfill the debt obligations and default judgment in China

Nº Q60059551 ★★★

Rare · Nature

Judgment defaulter

Person fails to fulfill the debt obligations and default judgment in China

Texte en anglais

In China, judgment defaulter (Chinese: 失信被执行人) or court defaulters, commonly known as laolai (Chinese: 老赖) or untrustworthy person (Chinese: 失信人), is defined as a person who is able to fulfill legal obligations determined by the court, but has refused to do so, or illegally tries to evade enforcement such as hiding their assets. According to the relevant regulations, persons who receive default judgment by the People's Courts are subject to restrictions on "high spending" or "high consumption" that are unrelated to basic living or bu...

Dernier prix

—

Prix plancher

—

Médiane 7 j

—

Ventes 30 j

0

Fourchette 30 j

—

En circulation

0

Cours

Voir le tableau
Datemédiane MinMaxventes

Historique des ventes

Dernière vente
—
Moyenne 30 j
—
Plus bas 30 j
—
Plus haut 30 j
—
Ventes 7 j
0
Ventes 30 j
0

Aucune vente pour l'instant.

Ventes anonymes : ni acheteur ni vendeur. Les chiffres ne comptent que les ventes entre joueurs.

№ Éditions numérotées · 0 frappées Prochain n° 1 · Score ×3
Sur Wikipédia

Texte en anglais Pas encore d'article dans ta langue : extrait en anglais.

In China, judgment defaulter (Chinese: 失信被执行人) or court defaulters, commonly known as laolai (Chinese: 老赖) or untrustworthy person (Chinese: 失信人), is defined as a person who is able to fulfill legal obligations determined by the court, but has refused to do so, or illegally tries to evade enforcement such as hiding their assets. According to the relevant regulations, persons who receive default judgment by the People's Courts are subject to restrictions on "high spending" or "high consumption" that are unrelated to basic living or business activities. These can include bans from traveling on high speed trains, or not being able to have your children go to private schools. Jeremy Daum, a senior research fellow at Yale Law School's Paul Tsai China Center, explains that the idea is that since the majority of "court awards" are going to be monetary, the "judgement defaulters" should not be continuing to be spending a lot of money if they have not yet paid back the court award, and instead their money should be spent to "fix that problem".

Texte : Wikipédia en anglais, CC BY-SA 4.0. ·

Cartes voisines

Confirmation