K

Khwaday-Namag

Middle Persian historical text

Nº Q6403399 ★★★

Rara · Literatura

Khwaday-Namag

Middle Persian historical text

Texto en inglés

Khwadāy-Nāmag (Iranian Persian: خدای‌نامه Khodây-Nâmeh/Xodây-Nâmeh; lit. 'Book of Lords/Kings') is the hypothetical title of a lost Middle Persian story from the Sasanian era. It presumably encompassed the national history of Iran from the beginning of time until the Sasanian period.

Último precio

—

Precio mínimo

—

Mediana 7 d

—

Ventas 30 d

0

Rango 30 d

—

En circulación

0

Cotización

Ver tabla
Fechamediana MínMáxventas

Historial de ventas

Última venta
—
Media 30 d
—
Mínimo 30 d
—
Máximo 30 d
—
Ventas 7 d
0
Ventas 30 d
0

Aún no hay ventas.

Ventas anónimas: sin comprador ni vendedor. Las cifras solo cuentan ventas entre jugadores.

№ Ediciones numeradas · 0 acuñadas Próximo n.º 1 · Puntos ×3
En Wikipedia

Texto en inglés Aún no hay artículo en tu idioma: extracto en inglés.

Khwadāy-Nāmag (Iranian Persian: خدای‌نامه Khodây-Nâmeh/Xodây-Nâmeh; lit. 'Book of Lords/Kings') is the hypothetical title of a lost Middle Persian story from the Sasanian era. It presumably encompassed the national history of Iran from the beginning of time until the Sasanian period. It was a remote predecessor of Ferdowsi's Shahnameh ('Book of Kings'), the 10th-century Iranian national epic, which, it is assumed, drew from a version or versions of the Khwaday-Namag. Scholars have tried to determine the content of the Khwaday-Namag through a comparison of Zoroastrian works, Islamic sources, and Ferdowsi's Shahnameh. Some scholars use the term Khwaday-Namag to refer to a tradition or genre of texts dealing with Sasanian or Iranian national history, rather than to refer to a single putative original text. According to Theodor Nöldeke's theory, the book itself was composed first during the reign of Khosrow I Anushirvan (r. 531–579), and enlarged in the reign of the last Sasanian monarch, Yazdegerd III (r. 632–651). It was translated into Arabic in the 8th century by the Persian translator and author Ibn al-Muqaffa, a Zoroastrian convert to Islam; this translation, too, is lost. Nöldeke believed that all later histories used al-Muqaffa's translation. In particular, the Annals of al-Tabari and Ferdowsi's Shahnameh are supposed to have best preserved the material of the Khwaday-Namag. While al-Muqaffa did in fact translate a Persian story called Khudāy-Nāma into Arabic, there were, by the 10th century, many Khudāy-Nāmas (none of which have survived) with different contents, so these cannot all have derived from al-Muqaffa's translation. Mahmoud Omidsalar and Touraj Daryaee state that it is very likely that there were already different versions of the Khwaday-Namag in Sasanian times, commissioned by different noble families and telling the same Iranian national epic in different ways. However, they do not exclude that a great Khwaday-Namag was produced by...

Texto: Wikipedia en inglés, CC BY-SA 4.0. ·

Cartas cercanas

Confirmación