Sycophancy (artificial intelligence)
Tendency of AI systems to tell users what they want to hear
Nº Q139915450 ★
Común · Historia
Sycophancy (artificial intelligence)
Tendency of AI systems to tell users what they want to hear
In the field of artificial intelligence, sycophancy is a tendency of large language models (LLMs) and other AI assistants to tailor their responses to what they predict the user wants to hear rather than to what is accurate or warranted. The behavior takes several forms: an assistant may agree with a user's stated opinion even when the user is mistaken; it may abandon a correct answer after a challenge such as "are you sure?"; it may validate beliefs, decisions or self-presentation regardless of merit; or it may praise the user, their work or t...
Último precio
—
Precio mínimo
—
Mediana 7 d
—
Ventas 30 d
0
Rango 30 d
—
En circulación
0
Cotización
mediana
mín – máx
ventas
Sin ventas en el periodo
Ver tabla
| Fecha | mediana | Mín | Máx | ventas |
|---|
Historial de ventas
- Última venta
- —
- Media 30 d
- —
- Mínimo 30 d
- —
- Máximo 30 d
- —
- Ventas 7 d
- 0
- Ventas 30 d
- 0
Aún no hay ventas.
Ventas anónimas: sin comprador ni vendedor. Las cifras solo cuentan ventas entre jugadores.
En Wikipedia
Texto en inglés Aún no hay artículo en tu idioma: extracto en inglés.
In the field of artificial intelligence, sycophancy is a tendency of large language models (LLMs) and other AI assistants to tailor their responses to what they predict the user wants to hear rather than to what is accurate or warranted. The behavior takes several forms: an assistant may agree with a user's stated opinion even when the user is mistaken; it may abandon a correct answer after a challenge such as "are you sure?"; it may validate beliefs, decisions or self-presentation regardless of merit; or it may praise the user, their work or their ideas in unwarranted terms. The word is borrowed from the ordinary English term for fawning flattery, and is used in AI alignment and AI safety research to describe a class of misalignment failures associated with training on human feedback. Researchers at Anthropic first documented the behavior systematically in 2022. They found that models fine-tuned with reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) were more likely than untuned models to repeat back a user's preferred answer. A 2023 follow-up paper, "Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models", showed that five frontier assistants from OpenAI, Anthropic and Meta all exhibited the behavior, and traced its origin to biases in the human preference data used during training. Later work documented sycophancy in mathematics, medicine, academic peer review and other domains, and identified a broader category called "social sycophancy" affecting an assistant's emotional and interpersonal responses. The issue drew widespread public attention in April 2025 after OpenAI rolled back an update to its GPT-4o model. Users had reported that the assistant praised dangerous decisions, endorsed delusional thinking and offered exaggerated compliments for trivial prompts. OpenAI's post-mortem attributed the change in behavior to an additional training signal based on user thumbs-up and thumbs-down feedback. That episode, together with reporting in The New York...
Texto: Wikipedia en inglés, CC BY-SA 4.0. ·
Cartas cercanas
Your AI Slop Bores Me
Nº Q138680820 ★
Alfabetización en Inteligencia Artificial
Nº Q126278541 ★★★★
Controversias relacionadas con la inteligencia artificial
Nº Q136462954 ★★
Seguridad de la inteligencia artificial
Nº Q116291231 ★★
Stochastic parrot
Nº Q122663230 ★★
Auge de la inteligencia artificial
Nº Q117336820 ★★★