Sycophancy (artificial intelligence)
Tendency of AI systems to tell users what they want to hear
Nº Q139915450 ★★
Peu commune · Histoire
Sycophancy (artificial intelligence)
Tendency of AI systems to tell users what they want to hear
In the field of artificial intelligence, sycophancy is a tendency of large language models (LLMs) and other AI assistants to tailor their responses to what they predict the user wants to hear rather than to what is accurate or warranted. The behavior takes several forms: an assistant may agree with a user's stated opinion even when the user is mistaken; it may abandon a correct answer after a challenge such as "are you sure?"; it may validate beliefs, decisions or self-presentation regardless of merit; or it may praise the user, their work or t...
Dernier prix
—
Prix plancher
—
Médiane 7 j
—
Ventes 30 j
0
Fourchette 30 j
—
En circulation
0
Cours
médiane
min – max
ventes
Aucune vente sur la période
Voir le tableau
| Date | médiane | Min | Max | ventes |
|---|
Historique des ventes
- Dernière vente
- —
- Moyenne 30 j
- —
- Plus bas 30 j
- —
- Plus haut 30 j
- —
- Ventes 7 j
- 0
- Ventes 30 j
- 0
Aucune vente pour l'instant.
Ventes anonymes : ni acheteur ni vendeur. Les chiffres ne comptent que les ventes entre joueurs.
Sur Wikipédia
Texte en anglais Pas encore d'article dans ta langue : extrait en anglais.
In the field of artificial intelligence, sycophancy is a tendency of large language models (LLMs) and other AI assistants to tailor their responses to what they predict the user wants to hear rather than to what is accurate or warranted. The behavior takes several forms: an assistant may agree with a user's stated opinion even when the user is mistaken; it may abandon a correct answer after a challenge such as "are you sure?"; it may validate beliefs, decisions or self-presentation regardless of merit; or it may praise the user, their work or their ideas in unwarranted terms. The word is borrowed from the ordinary English term for fawning flattery, and is used in AI alignment and AI safety research to describe a class of misalignment failures associated with training on human feedback. Researchers at Anthropic first documented the behavior systematically in 2022. They found that models fine-tuned with reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) were more likely than untuned models to repeat back a user's preferred answer. A 2023 follow-up paper, "Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models", showed that five frontier assistants from OpenAI, Anthropic and Meta all exhibited the behavior, and traced its origin to biases in the human preference data used during training. Later work documented sycophancy in mathematics, medicine, academic peer review and other domains, and identified a broader category called "social sycophancy" affecting an assistant's emotional and interpersonal responses. The issue drew widespread public attention in April 2025 after OpenAI rolled back an update to its GPT-4o model. Users had reported that the assistant praised dangerous decisions, endorsed delusional thinking and offered exaggerated compliments for trivial prompts. OpenAI's post-mortem attributed the change in behavior to an additional training signal based on user thumbs-up and thumbs-down feedback. That episode, together with reporting in The New York...
Texte : Wikipédia en anglais, CC BY-SA 4.0. ·