G

Girjas case

2020 Supreme Court of Sweden decision

The Girjas case is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of Sweden between the Girjas Sami village [sw] and the Swedish government concerning the right to issue hunting and fishing licenses within the Girjas district. The result was that while the "Swedish Reindeer Husbandry Act" did not grant the village rights to the licenses, the "possession since time immemorial" (in Swedish Urminnes hävd) did grant them the right to the licenses.

Nº Q109941519 ★★★

Rare · Littérature

Girjas case

2020 Supreme Court of Sweden decision

Texte en anglais

The Girjas case is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of Sweden between the Girjas Sami village [sw] and the Swedish government concerning the right to issue hunting and fishing licenses within the Girjas district. The result was that while the "Swedish Reindeer Husbandry Act" did not grant the village rights to the licenses, the "possession since time immemorial" (in Swedish Urminnes hävd) did grant them the right to the licenses.

Dernier prix

—

Prix plancher

—

Médiane 7 j

—

Ventes 30 j

0

Fourchette 30 j

—

En circulation

0

Cours

Voir le tableau
Datemédiane MinMaxventes

Historique des ventes

Dernière vente
—
Moyenne 30 j
—
Plus bas 30 j
—
Plus haut 30 j
—
Ventes 7 j
0
Ventes 30 j
0

Aucune vente pour l'instant.

Ventes anonymes : ni acheteur ni vendeur. Les chiffres ne comptent que les ventes entre joueurs.

№ Éditions numérotées · 0 frappées Prochain n° 1 · Score ×3
Sur Wikipédia

Texte en anglais Pas encore d'article dans ta langue : extrait en anglais.

The Girjas case is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of Sweden between the Girjas Sami village [sw] and the Swedish government concerning the right to issue hunting and fishing licenses within the Girjas district. The result was that while the "Swedish Reindeer Husbandry Act" did not grant the village rights to the licenses, the "possession since time immemorial" (in Swedish Urminnes hävd) did grant them the right to the licenses. The concept, according to research, was rarely used to justify the ownership of large plots of land as was the case here. Further, according to 16-17th century legislative usages, due to the abundance of land and minimal number of people, those who took care of the land were considered the de facto owners.

Texte : Wikipédia en anglais, CC BY-SA 4.0. ·

Cartes voisines

Voir la fiche

Confirmation