Girjas case
2020 Supreme Court of Sweden decision
The Girjas case is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of Sweden between the Girjas Sami village [sw] and the Swedish government concerning the right to issue hunting and fishing licenses within the Girjas district. The result was that while the "Swedish Reindeer Husbandry Act" did not grant the village rights to the licenses, the "possession since time immemorial" (in Swedish Urminnes hävd) did grant them the right to the licenses.
Nº Q109941519 ★★★
Rara · Literatura
Girjas case
2020 Supreme Court of Sweden decision
The Girjas case is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of Sweden between the Girjas Sami village [sw] and the Swedish government concerning the right to issue hunting and fishing licenses within the Girjas district. The result was that while the "Swedish Reindeer Husbandry Act" did not grant the village rights to the licenses, the "possession since time immemorial" (in Swedish Urminnes hävd) did grant them the right to the licenses.
Último preço
—
Preço mínimo
—
Mediana 7 d
—
Vendas 30 d
0
Faixa 30 d
—
Em circulação
0
Cotação
mediana
mín – máx
vendas
Sem vendas no período
Ver tabela
| Data | mediana | Mín | Máx | vendas |
|---|
Histórico de vendas
- Última venda
- —
- Média 30 d
- —
- Mínima 30 d
- —
- Máxima 30 d
- —
- Vendas 7 d
- 0
- Vendas 30 d
- 0
Ainda sem vendas.
Vendas anônimas: sem comprador nem vendedor. Os números contam só vendas entre jogadores.
Na Wikipédia
Texto em inglês Ainda não há artigo no seu idioma: trecho em inglês.
The Girjas case is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of Sweden between the Girjas Sami village [sw] and the Swedish government concerning the right to issue hunting and fishing licenses within the Girjas district. The result was that while the "Swedish Reindeer Husbandry Act" did not grant the village rights to the licenses, the "possession since time immemorial" (in Swedish Urminnes hävd) did grant them the right to the licenses. The concept, according to research, was rarely used to justify the ownership of large plots of land as was the case here. Further, according to 16-17th century legislative usages, due to the abundance of land and minimal number of people, those who took care of the land were considered the de facto owners.
Texto: Wikipédia em inglês, CC BY-SA 4.0. ·
Cartas próximas
Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden
Supreme court
Nº Q750632 ★★★★
Suprema Corte da Suécia
Nº Q741421 ★
Dislocation of Sámi people from Jukkasjärvi and Karesuando
20th-century forced migrations of Sámi people
Nº Q10706872 ★★★
Svea hovrätt
Nº Q731427 ★
Russian Pillage of 1719–1721
1719–1721 Russian raids on the Swedish east coast
Nº Q3428126 ★★
Ato de Sucessão à Coroa Sueca
Nº Q3208572 ★